- Federal Wealth Retirement Newsletter
- Posts
- Why Your TSP Should Be More Like a Start-Up—And Less Like a Certificate of Deposit
Why Your TSP Should Be More Like a Start-Up—And Less Like a Certificate of Deposit
Every federal employee knows the TSP is safe.
But sometimes, safe is just another word for slow.
If your portfolio looks like a padded bunker rather than a launchpad, you may be treating your retirement like a CD (Certificate of Disinterest)—not a wealth engine.
The Investor’s Identity Problem
Too many smart, capable federal employees approach the TSP with a scarcity mindset:
“Don’t lose money.”
“Don’t rock the boat.”
“Just play it safe in the G Fund.”
But what if you saw yourself not as a preserver, but a builder?
The ultra-wealthy do. And even with fewer resources, you can too.
Think Like a Start-Up
Start-ups don’t hoard capital. They put it to work:
They allocate for growth early—knowing time is their secret weapon.
They pivot fast when conditions change.
They don’t fear volatility—they leverage it.
You don’t need to be reckless. But treating your TSP like a business forces better questions:
“What’s my return on risk?”
“Where am I under-leveraged in growth?”
“Is my allocation matching my mission?”
A Sample “Fed Start-Up Strategy”
If you’re 10+ years from retirement, here’s a basic entrepreneurial-style allocation:
✅ 60% C & S Funds — High growth potential
✅ 20% I Fund — International diversification
✅ 20% G or F Fund — Core liquidity buffer
Rebalance quarterly. Review like a board meeting. Adjust like your future depends on it—because it does.
The Bottom Line
Your TSP isn’t just an account. It’s your freedom engine.
The G Fund feels safe. But it also quietly robs your future self of opportunity.
If you only grow at 2%, and inflation is 3%... you’re not saving—you’re slowly slipping.
Instead:
Treat it like a start-up.
Build it with vision.
Fuel it with strategy.
And give it the respect of a future CEO—not a cautious saver.
Your retirement deserves more than “safe.” It deserves sovereignty.
—FWR